Solutions
Consulting Practice
You deliver a Word document. The client files it and calls it the record. Three years later, if they need to demonstrate the evidentiary basis for that estimate, the Word document is what they have. TableOne Flow lets you deliver a Table 1 with the evidence linked to the JORC section that relied on it.
The same process, every project
Consulting practices that run several concurrent Table 1 engagements usually run them differently — the process depends on who is leading the project and what template they prefer. Evidence ends up in a shared drive. The client gets a finished document and a folder of files. How those two things relate to each other is not obvious to anyone who wasn’t in the room.
One standard. Every client. Every project
Set the firm’s criterion structure once. The “if not, why not” prompts are consistent across every engagement. Each client project is kept in its own workspace (multi-client team workspaces are planned in Business); evidence links to the JORC section it supports on that project. When the engagement is complete, the Table 1 exports as a structured record independent of the tool that produced it, with the evidence and its fingerprints recorded alongside it.
Client workspace separation — one client’s project cannot be seen from another’s — is planned for Business and is not in the build today. Project data stays on the device where it was drafted by default. For the cloud tiers, Australian data residency for product data is our stated objective, with the storage region confirmed in the product terms before any cloud-hosted tier is activated.
The Business tier is planned to give the practice lead a portfolio view across all active engagements — which projects are in draft, which are in Competent Person review, which have been exported. No chasing for status updates.
Projects
Sample5 clients
| Report ↕ | Status ↑ | Client ↕ | Project ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mineral Resources 2026 | In Review SO | Penrivet Resources | Penrivet Copper Project |
| Exploration Results 2026 | Awaiting CP MA | Corrimba Resources | Corrimba Gold Prospect |
| Mineral Resources 2026 | Draft | Quillenby Metals | Quillenby Creek Gold |
| Mineral Resources 2026 | Draft | Quillenby Metals | Tarranby Coal Project |
| Ore Reserves 2026 | ✓ CP-Signed SO | Cardwell Metals | Penrivet Ridge Silver Prospect |
| Exploration Results 2026 | ✓ Published MA | Quinn Downs Mining | Quinn Downs Silver Prospect |
Portfolio view — every client engagement across its lifecycle stage, with the lead Competent Person. · Sample data. · Scroll to see the full width.
The internal reviewer gate (planned)
In Business, a named internal reviewer will be able to check each project before it reaches the Competent Person. The reviewer works through the Table 1 criterion by criterion — flagging gaps, requesting evidence, or clearing sections — before the Competent Person receives the review queue. This workflow is planned and not yet available.
Planned for Business and not in the build today: the Competent Person receives a complete draft, not a first pass — no returning it for structural fixes a senior reviewer should have caught — and the practice keeps a record of who reviewed what, when, and what they flagged.
Contract and external Competent Persons (planned)
Many consulting practices work with contract Competent Persons who are not on staff. The Business tier is designed to let a contract Competent Person join a specific project without a paid TableOne Flow account of their own — receiving a review invitation, working through the criterion-by-criterion queue, with their decisions recorded against their identity. When the engagement ends, the project record — including the Competent Person’s review record — stays in your system. This workflow is planned and not yet available.
When a Competent Person leaves
If a Competent Person leaves your practice, every Table 1 they worked on — the criterion responses, the attached evidence, and the review record — remains in your system, attributed to them. The institutional knowledge of that project does not leave with the person. A successor Competent Person or a client coming back three years later can see exactly what was reviewed, by whom, and on what basis.
Your client deliverable is not a Word document that lives on someone’s laptop. It is a structured export tied to a complete project record that your firm holds.
The practice’s prior reports, shared
Your firm has drafted many Table 1s. That body of work usually lives across project folders and in senior geologists’ heads. A shared reference library (planned) will bring your prior published JORC reports into every new engagement: each drafter can see how the practice approached sampling techniques, geological interpretation, or modifying factors — as a read-only reference, with every response still drafted to the current data.
On Business, the reference library is planned to be shared across the team — the practice’s prior published work, available to everyone who drafts — while client project data is designed to stay in its own client workspace.
Tiers for consulting practices
Business — naming a Competent Person per Table 1 section, the shared practice account, client workspace separation, the internal-reviewer role and the practice-level portfolio are all planned for Business and are not in the build today. Intended for practices managing several concurrent client projects with more than one Competent Person.
Enterprise (planned) — for practices where client data must remain on your own infrastructure. Self-hosted deployment, onboarding support and contract terms that suit your organisation are all planned.
Getting started
Tell us how many active client engagements you run at once and whether you have data residency requirements. We’ll write back directly.