Solutions
The JORC 2012 Table 1 workflow for your situation
The process looks different depending on who is drafting, who is reviewing, and how many projects are running at once. TableOne Flow is a Windows desktop application at launch (macOS and Linux planned). On Solo your project data stays on your device today, and always can; on Team and above it is held in your TableOne Flow account, with a fully local mode planned. Cloud sync and backup are opt-in and planned.
What a Table 1 looks like
Quinn Downs Mining Ltd
Table 1 — Appendix
Quinn Downs Silver Prospect — Exploration Results
Appendix to the Company’s Public Report — prepared under the JORC Code, 2012 Edition
Section 1 — Sampling Techniques and Data
Sampling techniques
Diamond drill core was sampled in nominal 1 m intervals, half-core split with a diamond saw, and submitted to a NATA-accredited laboratory. Sample representivity was assured through documented protocols and routine insertion of certified reference materials and field duplicates.
Drilling techniques
Diamond core (PQ/HQ/NQ) drilling was used throughout the programme, oriented where structural data was required…
Drill sample recovery
Core recovery was logged for every run and averaged above 95 % across the programme; no relationship was observed between recovery and grade…
Logging, and the remaining Section 1 criteria follow — each addressed, or documented “if not, why not” — ahead of Section 2, Reporting of Exploration Results.
The Competent Person’s Statement, and the consent given under JORC Code 2012 Clause 9, appear in the Public Report this Table 1 accompanies — not in the appendix.
An excerpt of a finished JORC 2012 Table 1 in publication form — whatever your situation, the same structured output. · Sample data — not a real JORC report.
Section 1
Sampling Techniques and Data
- 1 Sampling techniques Addressed
- 2 Drilling techniques Addressed
- 3 Drill sample recovery Addressed
- 4 Logging Addressed
- 5 Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation Addressed
- 6 Quality of assay data and laboratory tests Addressed
- 7 Verification of sampling and assaying Addressed
- 8 Location of data points Addressed
- 9 Data spacing and distribution Addressed with Explanation
- 10 Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Not yet addressed
- 11 Sample security Not yet addressed
- 12 Audits or reviews Not yet addressed
Whatever the situation, the same structured Table 1: every JORC 2012 criterion tracked to completion before it reaches Competent Person review. · Sample data. · Scroll to see the full width.
Find your situation
Solo Competent Person
You draft the whole Table 1 on Solo and sign it the way you sign today, outside the tool. Evidence is linked to the JORC section it justifies, and the report’s history exports as a fingerprinted change log on every tier. Capturing the signature in the tool — the Competent Person’s review of each criterion, the sign-off record and the in-app change history — is Team.
Solo Competent Person →
Contract Competent Person
You sign for clients who don’t have a Competent Person on staff. Each engagement is a separate record — you deliver the Table 1 as a structured export, with the evidence recorded alongside it, and keep your own defensible copy.
Contract Competent Person →
Competent Person & Drafter Team
One Competent Person with geologists and engineers contributing section by section. Criterion assignment, named edits and a Competent Person review queue, so the draft that reaches sign-off is not a reconciliation.
Competent Person & Drafter Team →
Consulting Practice
For practices running several client engagements at once. Naming a Competent Person per Table 1 section, multiple client projects on one account, client workspace separation and the practice-level portfolio are all planned for Business and are not in the build today.
Consulting Practice →
In-house Resource Team
Multiple projects, multiple geologists, one company. A consistent drafting process across every deposit and every report, with a per-project record from first draft to published Table 1. The practice-level portfolio view across a team is planned (Business).
In-house Resource Team →
Not sure which fits? Describe your situation and we will point you to the right tier.
Students and lecturers: academic pricing is available for coursework, teaching and research — not for commercial reporting. See academic pricing.