Solutions

CP & Drafter Team

The JORC 2012 Table 1 arrives in your inbox as a Word document. You send comments. A revised version comes back. By the time you’re reviewing the final draft, you’re not reviewing a record — you’re reconciling one. TableOne Flow makes the CP’s review the final step in a structured process, not a reconstruction of one.

What the CP actually needs at sign-off

The Exploration Geologist drafted sampling and QAQC. The Resource Geologist drafted geological interpretation and estimation. The Mining Engineer drafted modifying factors. By the time those drafts reach the CP, they’ve usually been through two or three email rounds and the evidence is somewhere in a shared drive that not everyone can navigate.

The problem is not the team. The problem is that Word documents cannot show the CP who wrote which criterion, what evidence was attached when, or what changed between the version they saw last week and the one in their inbox today.

Each criterion has a history. The CP can read it

Evidence attaches to each criterion as the draft is built. Incomplete criteria and criteria with no attached evidence file are flagged before the draft reaches the CP — gaps are a drafting problem, not a review problem.

In Pro, criteria are assigned to named team members. When a drafter updates a criterion, the change is logged against their identity with a timestamp. The CP sees a review queue: which criteria are Accepted, which Need revision, which are not yet reviewed. Review comments anchor to the criterion. When a response or piece of evidence changes, the CP can read the diff — exactly what changed, who changed it, and when.

At sign-off, the CP has reviewed the record, not just the output.

Tiers for CP and drafter teams

Pro — one CP licence with a configured set of named drafters, criterion assignment, and the full CP review workflow. Right for a CP working with a small team on a single project at a time. See what’s included in Pro.

Business — multiple concurrent projects, portfolio view, and an internal-reviewer role for a QA gate before work reaches the CP. Right for larger teams or practices managing several projects at once. See what’s included in Business.

Getting started

Register interest — tell us how many drafters typically work on a report and how your current review process works. We’ll write back directly.